MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7005715712

Salmon and Sea Trout Angling: Anglers’ Conservation preferences. ESRI Research Bulletin 2019/17

2019· other· en· W7005715712 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchive of European Integration (AEI) (University of Pittsburgh) · 2019
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCanadian Bulletin of Medical History
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleofectionGestational periodTSG101Articular cartilage damageDiafiltrationHyporeflexiaFusible alloyDemotion
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The year 2019 is designated ‘International year of the salmon’ by the North Atlantic Salmon Conservation Organization (NASCO), to stimulate research and encourage the general public to support salmon conservation. This research, which has been funded by Inland Fisheries Ireland, responds to the wider international call for establishing the conditions for resilience of salmon stocks in a changing world. Salmon and sea trout stocks have declined dramatically over the last few decades due to excessive fishing, habitat decline and the impacts of climate change. The research considers anglers’ preferences for salmon and trout conservation from two perspectives: their attitudes to fishing catch and release (which limits the loss of spawning potential) and their preferences for conservation-oriented options for fishery management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.150

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0450.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchive of European Integration (AEI) (University of Pittsburgh)French-language works237,207