Research program on the seismic resistance of conventional wood-frame construction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Canada's wood products research institute, Forintek Canada Corp., in collaboration with Tongji University of Shanghai, China, and the Trees and Timber Institute, Italy, initiated a research program in 2004 on the seismic resistance of conventional wood-frame construction. The objective is to provide data needed for the quantitative assessment of the seismic building code provisions for this type of housing in both Canada and China. The research program is designed to generate complementary data to the experimental and analytical work carried out under the recently completed CUREE program in California, among others. The program comprises shake table tests of two two-story buildings, cyclic tests of large shear wall configurations, simplified and detailed analytical studies, and application to codes and standards. Tests carried out at the Tongji University 4 m by 4 m shake table subjected two two-story specimens, 6.0 m by 6.0 m in plan, to a progression of 3 seismic motions at amplitudes of 0.1, 0.2, 0.4 and 0.55 g PGA. Both symmetrical and nonsymmetrical configurations were tested; capacity spectra and changes in natural frequencies for the symmetric case are presented here.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".