MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7005767356

Signalling Through the PGC-1a Pathway Mediates an Inducible Stress Response in Retinal Astrocytes to Resist Oxidative and Metabolic Insults

2015· dissertation· en· W7005767356 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace (University of Toronto) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAstrocyteOxidative stressMediatorMitochondrionTranscription factorSignal transductionAntioxidantPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptorGene expression
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glaucoma is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by the loss of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in the eye. Astrocytes are an adjacent cell type that provides metabolic support and antioxidant defense for the RGCs and the loss of these neurosupportive functions contributes to the pathogenesis of glaucoma. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator-1 alpha (PGC-1a) is a transcriptional co-activator that regulates the expression of metabolic and antioxidant genes through interactions with transcription factors. PGC-1a deficiency has recently been implicated in neurodegeneration, but its role in mediating astrocyte functions is not well understood. In this study, PGC-1a activity and its expression were induced in astrocytes following metabolic and oxidative stress. Under these conditions, pharmacological stimulation of PGC-1a improved antioxidant capacity, mitochondria biogenesis, and increase astrocyte viability through regulations of downstream gene expression. Thus, PGC-1a is a key mediator of astrocyte stress responses, which can be targeted to promote their neurosupportive functions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace (University of Toronto)→Same topicLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy→French-language works237,207→