MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7005772801

SASKIA E. WIERINGA, ed., Traveling Heritages: New Perspectives on Collecting, Preserving and Sharing Womenâs History

2010· article· en· W7005772801 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchivaria · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Diversity and Evolution
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
Keywordsnot available
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Traveling Heritages is a collection of essays reflecting on the acquisition, accessibility, and interpretation of archival materials and other information resources concerning women's history.Specifically, these essays relate to materials collected by, resources developed for, and projects associated with, the International Information Centre and Archives for the Women's Movement (IIAV), located in Amsterdam.The book's inspiration was the IIAV's seventi eth anniversary celebration in December 2005, which included a seminar with presentations by information professionals and academics focusing on archives and libraries whose collection mandates include women's history.Since the publication of Traveling Heritages, IIAV has been renamed Aletta: Institute for Women's History, in honour of Aletta Jacobs, the first universitytrained female doctor in the Netherlands, a suffragist, and social and peace activist, whose fonds forms the core of IIAV's early archival holdings.The change in the institutional name reflects a major departure from IIAV's ori ginal mandate to collect women's history from around the world, in order to focus primarily on information resources about Dutch women.Traveling Heritages situates IIAV's past work in the context of first and second wave (predominantly European) feminist movements, and also sets out to consider assumptions of truth in collecting, representing, and teaching about women's experiences.In different ways, each essay supports the notion that the selection of women's documentary heritage for long-term preservation, and its subsequent use, is a process that was, and is, affected by gender and class, and political and racial subjectivities of the participating individuals and institu tions.The social construction of objectivity is critiqued throughout the book, and information professionals, researchers, and educators are encouraged to consider how their work contributes to understanding the diverse realities of women.The use of the word "traveling" in the book's title connotes movement, while "heritages" implies multiple traditions and in her introduction, editor Saskia

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.916
Threshold uncertainty score0.543

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchivariaSame topicPlant Diversity and EvolutionFrench-language works237,207