MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7005838928

SoMeIL: A social media infodemic listening for public health behaviours conceptual framework

2023· dissertation· en· W7005838928 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsMisinformationSocial mediaPublic healthConceptual frameworkThematic analysisHealth belief modelHealth communicationSocial determinants of healthHealth care
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction \nThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has escalated health infodemics given substantially digitalized daily life since the pandemic began. The number of social media users has skyrocketed. However, this has brought issues given misleading health information circulating on social media platforms that can lead to undesirable behaviours compromising individual or public health in real life. One long-lasting health issue is vaccine hesitancy, which has been further compounded by health infodemics on social media. According to the World Health Organization, health infodemics occur when too much information that makes true information competes with misinformation for people’s attention, understanding, and adherence to recommended health interventions. Existing theories and theoretical constructs have been applied to study public behaviours influenced by health infodemics on social media. However, these theories have limited to individual behaviours and ignored other critical factors. Furthermore, the current theories have rarely reflected the nature of social media as information can be disseminated instantly and massively without geographical restrictions regardless of information quality. Therefore, this dissertation aimed to address these limitations by proposing a solution that can listen to public discourse on social media and infer their behavioural intentions in real life. \nMethods \nThe scoping review (Study I) was conducted by following the methods of Arksey and O'Malley as well as Levac et al. to identify and synthesize literature related to the research question. The theory construction methodology was used in the conceptual paper (Study II) to review existing theories and propose a new conceptual framework. Next, the Latent Dirichlet allocation topic modelling and qualitative thematic analysis were applied in the preliminary and partial qualitative validation study (Study III). The last study (Study IV) applied structural equation modeling (SEM) to infer people’s intentions toward COVID-19 vaccination in real life from Twitter amid the pandemic as a preliminary and partial validation for the proposed conceptual framework. \nResults \nA total of 2,405 articles published between November 1, 2019, and November 4, 2020, were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, and PsycINFO. After removing duplicates, non-empirical literature, and irrelevant studies, a total of 81 articles written in English published in peer-reviewed journals were included in the scoping review (Study I). Six themes were found and reported: (1) surveying public attitudes, (2) identifying infodemics, (3) assessing mental health, (4) detecting or predicting COVID-19 cases, (5) analyzing government responses to the pandemic, and (6) evaluating quality of health information in prevention education videos. The findings also suggested knowledge gaps in real-time COVID-19 surveillance using social media data and limited machine learning or artificial intelligence techniques used in overall COVID-19 research using social media data except the first theme. In the conceptual paper (Study II), a new conceptual framework—social media infodemic listening for public health behaviors (SoMeIL) —was proposed to address limitations in existing theories given lacking systematic and theoretical foundation for such research. After the SoMeIL was proposed, validations were needed. A preliminary qualitative validation and demonstration using Twitter data about the Canadian Freedom Convoy were conductedto partially validate and illustrate how the SoMeIL conceptual framework could be applied (Study III). Finally, the findings from SEM in the last study (Study IV) showed statistically significant associations between the latent variable and the observed variables derived from Twitter. This study provided preliminary evidence to validate partial components in the proposed SoMeIL conceptual framework that could be used as a proxy to infer people’s vaccination intentions in real life. It also demonstrated the feasibility of using Twitter data in SEM research besides typical surveys. \nConclusion \nThe scoping review (Study I) was important since it identified various roles that social media data have played in research related to the COVID-19 pandemic. It also informed us of knowledge gaps to be bridged. This led us to the conceptual paper (Study II) since we identified limitations in existing theories when the current theories or theoretical constructs were applied in health research that analyzed social media data. A new conceptual framework—SoMeIL—was proposed accordingly. A preliminary qualitative study was followed to validate and demonstrate partial components of the SoMeIL conceptual framework. The last study (Study IV) showed preliminary evidence to show that parts of the SoMeIL conceptual framework was workable given statistically significant relationships found among certain constructs. As a result, Twitter data in this dissertation could be used as a proxy to infer people’s vaccination behavior in real life as suggested by the proposed conceptual framework. Yet more research is needed to further validate and improve the proposed SoMeIL conceptual framework. If social media listening can be integrated into future pandemic preparedness as the proposed conceptual framework suggests, it can help health authorities and governmental agencies promptly shape public perception, disseminate more scientific information, and influence behaviors during a health crisis in a timely fashion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.104

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0110.007
Science and technology studies0.0060.016
Scholarly communication0.0130.013
Open science0.0040.010
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)→Same topicFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology→French-language works237,207→