Současný stav a perspektivy Working Equitation v České republice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The thesis deals with the new horse riding discipline in the Czech Republic, called working equitation (WE), which draws from the tradition of Spanish, Portuguese, Italian and French shepherds. The discipline consists of dressage and trail, speed trail in more advanced riders and on the top level the riders make up teams for the trial with cattle. The discipline is organized by an international authority called World Association for Working Equitation (WAWE) and one of its aims is to preserve the traditions and skills of the working horse riders of the world. The aim of the thesis is to introduce this new discipline to the general public, deals with its history, present and the future, and includes a brief overlook of the history of horse riding and of a horse as a species. In the thesis I have elaborated an overlook of historical connections and the present spreading of this discipline in the Czech Republic and in the world. The discipline is open for the fans of western and english horse riding and thus allows for their comparison, and at the same time it's not that demanding on the anatomical condition of the horse. Overcoming obstacles lets the rider show their skill, but also livens up the classical dressage or reining. On the other hand, working equitation sets high demand on the riders' skill and requires a highly trained horse, which may unfortunately discourage some riders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".