“So, now I speak” : NunatuKavut Inuit voices on sexual violence, justice, and resilience
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This project engaged NunatuKavut Inuit in exploring experiences of sexual violence, justice, and resilience.To date, no qualitative research has focused on experiences of sexual violence among NunatuKavut Inuit or within Labrador.Five NunatuKavut Inuit community members participated in interviews related to police, the justice system, and sexual violence support services.Reflexive thematic analysis uncovered two overarching themes, colonialism and resilience, and eight sub-themes.These community members identified needs related to increasing support services and service providers, improving justice system navigation, and implementing more education for Indigenous survivors.Findings of this project are of interest not only to NunatuKavut Inuit, stakeholders, and survivors, but also to Indigenous Peoples and allies across Labrador, including health and justice service providers.Findings broaden what is known about experiences of Indigenous Peoples in Canada, and help inform policies and community-based practices regarding sexual violence, justice and resilience in Labrador.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.045 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".