Should The Ottawa Senators Qualify RFA Adam Gaudette? + 2022 NHL Draft Rankings 8-7
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We continue to take a look at the RFA's in the Ottawa Senators franchise and today's player is Adam Gaudette. Brandon Piller and Ross Levitan discuss what type of contract would Gaudette be eligible for, what is his role on this team and if it makes sense for the Sens to sign him or let him go. We continue our Prospect Profile Rankings with #8 and the Sens selection #7. #8 Cutter Gauthier and #7: Matthew Savoie. The Tampa Bay Lightning thrive back at home in Game 3 of the Stanley Cup Finals and Philippe Daoust has a big performance in the first game of the Memorial Cup!Check us out on TWITTER and YOUTUBE!Support us by supporting our sponsors!Built BarBuilt Bar is a protein bar that tastes like a candy bar. Go to builtbar.com and use promo code \\"LOCKED15,\\" and you'll get 15% off your next order.Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.852 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".