MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7005935500

Semantic and syntactic labor

2021· book· en· W7005935500 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Portal (Queen's University Belfast) · 2021
Typebook
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiological and pharmacological studies of plants
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeaning (existential)Semantics (computer science)Subject (documents)Semantic propertySemantic role labelingSemantic featureSyntaxSemantic analysis (machine learning)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The book is concerned with a distinction between semantic and syntactic labor. Semantic labor is understood as human mental labor motivated by direct engagement with meaning and syntactic labor as mental labor determined by patterns of expression. The distinction molds into a distinction of human semantic labor from machine (computer) syntactic process. It precisely, and uniquely, captures the current distribution of mental labor between human and machine. The aim of the book is to give a full synthesis of current understanding of the distinction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.147

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.007
Scholarly communication0.0060.009
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0440.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Portal (Queen's University Belfast)Same topicBiological and pharmacological studies of plantsFrench-language works237,207