MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7005943477

The State, the Community and the Individual; Local Custom and the Construction of Orthodoxy in the Sijills of Ottoman-Cairo, 1558-1646.

2006· dissertation· en· W7005943477 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2006
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLinguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthodoxyJurisprudenceCommon lawIslamShariaSources of law
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public par télécommunication ou par l'Internet, prêter, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans le monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, sur support microforme, papier, électronique et/ou autres formats.L'auteur conserve la propriété du droit d'auteur et des droits moraux qui protège cette thèse.Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement reproduits sans son autorisation.Conformément à la loi canadienne sur la protection de la vie privée, quelques formulaires secondaires ont été enlevés de cette thèse.Bien que ces formulaires aient inclus dans la pagination, il n'y aura aucun contenu manquant.,r---.. Acknowledgement 1 would like to express my sincere appreciation to the Many individuals who provided invaluable assistance, advice and support during the researching and writing ofthis dissertation.1 begin with my primary supervisor, Dr. Donald P. Little, without whom 1 could not have completed this research.His meticulous standards, thorough reviews and criticisms have improved every aspect of this work.Dr. Little's formidable knowledge of the documentary tradition guided my education in diplomaties, the primary and seeondary sources of relevance to them, as weIl as the modes of quantification and analyses necessary for deciphering their content.1 am indebted to him for the generous support, both aeademic and personal, that he has given me over the years. 1 am also grateful to Dr. Uner Turgay, my secondary advisor for his knowledge of the Turkish primary sources, his helpful comments and suggestions and his unfailing encouragement throughout the years.Whatever merit this research possesses is thanks to their thorough supervision.1 must also thank other distinguished scholars at the institute of Islarnic studies, people like Drs.Issa J. Boullata and Hermann Landolt, whose courses were instrumental in shaping my understanding ofIslam, its intellectual trajectory and its institutional history.Two other notable scholars from the department ofNear and Middle East Civilizations at the University of Toronto, Drs.James Reilly and Linda Northrop, also warrant my appreciation for taking the time to comment upon aspects of this work and for generously sharing their knowledge of the documents, sources and region under study.No researcher

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.657
Threshold uncertainty score0.689

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0090.022
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicLinguistic, Cultural, and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207