MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7005950221

Spatial Inequalities of Maternal Emergency Department Visits During Pregnancy and Postpartum in the Two Largest Urban Centres in Alberta: A Tale of Two Citites

2024· dissertation· en· W7005950221 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCrustacean biology and ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocioeconomic statusInequalityPregnancyEmergency departmentRetrospective cohort studyPostpartum periodPopulationIndex (typography)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The perinatal period is extremely sensitive with immediate and long-term consequences for both the mother and child. In Alberta, inequalities exist in maternal utilization of emergency department (ED) services across socioeconomic groups and several demographic and clinical characteristics. However, the geographic distribution of these inequalities has not been fully explored. The aim of this study was to identify geographic inequalities in maternal ED utilization during pregnancy and postpartum in Calgary and Edmonton, two major urban centres in Western Canada. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional geographic analysis of data from a retrospective cohort of all pregnancies leading to live births that occurred between 2011 and 2017 within the city limits of Calgary and Edmonton. Dissemination areas were used as the geographic unit to aggregate all ED visits. Spatial filters were used to generate spatial groups for the identification of geographic inequalities in the prevalence of maternal ED utilization, through a Concentration Index approach, in both Calgary and Edmonton. The percentage of individual and ED-visit characteristics were compared across the area groups delineated by the spatial filters. Results: The average gap between areas with the highest and the lowest prevalence of maternal ED utilization was 1.8-fold in Calgary and 2.3-fold in Edmonton. During the postpartum period, the difference was 2.18-fold for Calgary and 2.70-fold for Edmonton. Results from the concentration index showed moderate inequality in Calgary (-0.14 for pregnancy; - 0.14 for postpartum) and Edmonton (-0.17 for pregnancy; -0.20 for postpartum). Areas of higher ED utilization were associated with a higher percentage of women under 25 years at birth, comorbid mental health conditions, inadequate prenatal care, and a lower percentage of obstetric-related ED visits. In Edmonton, the percentage of pregnancies with major or minor comorbidities were greater in areas of higher ED utilization. Conclusion: Geographic inequalities in maternal ED utilization were not completely explained by the spatial distribution of socioeconomic status. Geographic patterns of inequality during the pregnancy and postpartum period were identified. Age, comorbidities including both mental health and major or moderate chronic conditions, inadequate prenatal care, and lower prevalence of obstetric-related visits were associated with areas of higher ED utilization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Same topicCrustacean biology and ecologyFrench-language works237,207