MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7006047145

Structure preserving spectral methods and exponential integrators for the numerical solution of stiff semi-linear partial differential equations

2020· dissertation· en· W7006047145 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNumerical methods for differential equations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExponential integratorSpectral methodMatrix exponentialNumerical stabilityNumerical partial differential equationsNumerical analysisDiscretizationPartial differential equationBoundary value problemExponential function
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this thesis, we present numerical solution of semilinear partial differential equations (PDEs) where the linear differential operator is a self-adjoint. A recent spectral method for self-adjoint operators, based on basis recombination, leads to symmetric definite matrices, which have real spectrum. This allows for developing stable time-stepping algorithm to solve the resulting the ordinary differential equations. The linear part of the discretized problem is usually stiff, which constraints the step size for explicit numerical schemes. We therefore use exponential integrators, a well-known time-stepping methods for solving stiff differential equations. We describe three methods namely, eigen-decomposition, contour integral and Carath\'{e}odory-Fej\'{e}r approximation, for computing the matrix ($\varphi$) functions of the exponential integrators. We perform numerical experiments with some PDEs with different boundary conditions, including time-dependent boundary condition and the numerical results confirm the accuracy of the methods in both space and time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)Same topicNumerical methods for differential equationsFrench-language works237,207