MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7006060136

Susceptibility of different varieties of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop) to some herbicides

2020· article· en· W7006060136 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAgroSpace (University of Belgrade, Faculty of Agriculture) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt History and Market Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThistleEcotypeCirsium arvenseWeedWeed controlHerbicide resistance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Knowing the biology of weeds and their biodiversity at different levels is essential to weed control. More or less expressed morphological differences between ecotypes within a species could be associated with the different responses of plants to the herbicides applied. This fact indicates that more data should be collected on the reaction of individual ecotypes to different herbicides as our understanding of variability has considerable practical value in terms of more efficient control, as well as for identifying the modes of resistance to herbicides in scientific research. We investigated the susceptibility of two varieties of Canada thistle, C. arvense var. arvense and C. arvense var. vestitum, to the following herbicides: 2,4-D-2EHE, bentasone + dichlorprop-P, mesotrione, and bentasone + MCPA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.555
Threshold uncertainty score0.762

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgroSpace (University of Belgrade, Faculty of Agriculture)Same topicArt History and Market AnalysisFrench-language works237,207