MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7006066378

Structural and functionnal [sic] consequences of oxygen induced retinopathy

2001· dissertation· en· W7006066378 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2001
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCell Image Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsBibliothèque et Archives nationales du QuébecMontreal Children's Hospital
FundersMedical Research Council
KeywordsRetinopathy of prematurityRetinalHyperoxiaRetinopathyRetinaFundus (uterus)ElectroretinographyBlind spot
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a potentially blinding retinal disorder, which results from the exposure of the premature infant to hyperoxia. The diagnosis and the assessment of severity of ROP are based on the degree of retinal vascular abnormalities (such as avascular peripheral retina and neovascularisation), which are observed upon fundus examination. However, even if the vascular consequences of ROP are resolved, functional sequels such as high myopia, anisometropia and strabismus, may persist through adulthood. In severe cases, even more dramatic consequences, namely retinal detachment and blindness, may also occur. In oxygen-induced retinopathy (OIR), the animal model of ROP, hyperoxia-induced vasoobliteration and neovascularisation have been studied extensively in mice, rats, cats and dogs. However, the functional and ultrastructural changes that might result from the exposure to hyperoxia have not yet been examined in details. In this study, we report functional, as assessed with the electroretinogram (ERG), and structural, determined with histological sections of the retina, consequences of postnatal hyperoxia which took place during a period of intense retinal maturation, that is, the first 14 days of life of Sprague Dawley rats.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicCell Image Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207