MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7006126051

Structure and development of the intellectual potential of the industrial enterprise personnel

2015· other· en· W7006126051 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuezvestiya of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus (National Academy of Sciences of Belarus) · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnterprise planning systemEnterprise systems engineeringEnterprise life cycleEnterprise softwareProduction (economics)Intellectual capitalPrivate enterpriseHuman resourcesHuman resource management
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

© 2015, Canadian Center of Science and Education. All rights reserved. The purpose of this article is to develop the conditions of the management system improvement and the industrial enterprise personnel development. Presented article defines the intellectual potential of the enterprise personnel, its location, components and forms of appearance in the enterprise activities. The personnel intellectual potential is an important factor of scientific and technical progress and increases the efficiency of all aspects of industrial enterprise production and commercial activities. The results of the present study indicate the need to evaluate and determine the directions of the enterprise personnel intellectual potential development to achieve the strategic company’s goals and creating competitive advantages. This article is intended for managers, executives, HR staff and researchers dealing with personnel development of the industrial enterprise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuezvestiya of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus (National Academy of Sciences of Belarus)French-language works237,207