State-Property, Communal-Property or Open-Access? The Case of Ibiraquera Lagoon, Brazil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
"The broad objective of this paper is to investigate the dynamics of institutions and changing resource systems for building social-ecological resilience. Here, I analyze a case study, the Ibiraquera Lagoon fishing management, in Brazil, which has experienced several changes in the social as well as ecological system in the last four decades. In this case study the dynamics of ecological system and social system have different time scale. The lagoons fishing stock and water are renewed two to four times a year due to the lagoons connection to the ocean. On the other hand, the management system has experienced just four major changes in the last four decades. Although the Ibiraquera lagoon has always been legally a state property, in 1960s the lagoon system was de facto managed as a communal property (a community-based management system); from 1970 to 1981, the system was de facto in an open-access condition; from 1981 to 1994 the lagoon was de facto a co-management system (between local fishers and Federal Government); and since 1994 the lagoon has becoming an open-access system again."
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".