A survey of blue-stain fungi in Northwestern Ontario and characterization of mobile introns in ribosomal DNA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work presents a survey of blue-stain fungi found in Northwestern Ontario, characterization of a homing endonuclease gene within Grosmannia piceiperda and finally an examination of the introns and homing endonuclease genes found in the large ribosomal subunit gene in species of Ceratocystis; using molecular techniques and phylogenetic analysis, we studied the molecular evolution of these mobile genetic elements. The blue-stain fungi of Northwestern Ontario were identified based on phylogenic analysis of rDNA internal transcribed spacer region sequences. This data was supplemented with morphological characteristics of the fungal cultures. The second project was an examination of a LAGLIDADG homing endonuclease and its IC2 group I intron. This intron is uniquely positioned within the group I intron-encoded rps3 gene of the large subunit ribosomal RNA gene. The final chapter is an investigation of the large subunit ribosomal RNA gene in species of Ceratocystis. The 3’ segment of this gene contains several novel introns and homing endonuclease genes. There is also much diversity between strains despite their close relation on the rDNA internal transcribed spacer region phylogenetic tree. Further, our data also suggest that the single motif LAGLIDADG homing endonuclease of the rDNA mL1923 intron is likely to be an ancestor to other homing endonucleases in the area. The results of these studies demonstrate the role that these elements play in the genetic diversity observed in the blue-stain fungi.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".