Study on language comprehension in aphasic subjects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Aphasia is a disorder which stems from cerebral lesion and impairs both language\nexpression and comprehension. Objective: to investigate language comprehension in aphasic\nindividuals through the comprehension test battery of Montreal Toulouse Test (alpha version).\nStudy Design: A retrospective, descriptive, qualitative-quantitative research involving 60 subjects,\nranging from 40-70 years old. Data crossing including comprehension of: spoken words (SWC),\nwritten words (WWC), spoken simple phrases (SSPC), written simple phrases (WSPC), spoken\ncomplex phrases (SCPC) and written complex phrases (WCPC). Results: the higher the SWC, the\nhigher the WWC; the higher the SSPC and SCPC, the higher the WSPC and WCPC and vice versa;\ncomparing spoken and written comprehension: the higher the WC, the higher the PC; the higher the\nSPC, the higher the CPC and vice-versa; no correlation between age and gender was found.\nConclusion: the comprehension of simple structures benefits the comprehension of complex\nstructures and the difficulty in the comprehension of simple structures associates with the difficulty\nin comprehension of complex structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".