MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7006156582

Staff Scheduling During a Pandemic

2021· dissertation· en· W7006156582 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicScheduling and Timetabling Solutions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScheduling (production processes)PandemicJob shop schedulingNurse scheduling problemCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Dynamic priority schedulingSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Health care2019-20 coronavirus outbreakProcess (computing)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The year 2019 revealed that some of the policies which have shaped the core structure of many organizations in different industries for a long time, could result in an absolute failure in an unprecedented crisis like the COVID-19 pandemic. In the light of such changes, the interaction between the people is a determining factor to limit an outbreak among the staff members of an organization to prevent any disruption in the process of the service/product they provide. Thus, an effective staff scheduling policy can be the clincher to achieve this goal. \nIn this work, we consider a staff scheduling problem with the goal of minimizing the expected number of staff replacements that happens as a result of getting infected during a pandemic. In this days-off scheduling problem, we discuss a two-stage optimization approach where we first, determine the optimal scheduling patterns for the staff members and next, we will assign them to different resources so that the interaction between the staff members is minimized. In the proposed mathematical formulation for the problem, we consider the characteristics of the disease and the situation of the public health at different stages of the pandemic such as the incubation period, the probability of getting infected on a working day versus a rest-day, and the availability of swab tests. We design a column generation algorithm to solve the optimization model which requires up to 70% less computational power compared to the traditional algorithms that solve the problem when all available patterns are generated. A simulation model is also designed to compare the effectiveness of our suggested policies with the traditional scheduling policies. We examine our findings using data from the Grand River Regional Cancer Centre (GRRCC), which is a comprehensive cancer treatment and research centre located in Kitchener, Ontario. Particularly, we worked closely with the Department of Medical Physics and Radiation Oncology who plans and delivers radiation therapy treatments to cancer patients and treats over 2000 new patients annually. Our results show that depending on the different stages of a pandemic, the proposed staff scheduling policies can lead up to 20% less full-time equivalent staff replacements which have a significant impact on the availability of the centre's resources as well as the patient flow in long-term.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Same topicScheduling and Timetabling SolutionsFrench-language works237,207