MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7006161737

Strategic and tactical decision-making for inpatient admission and hospital bed allocation: an application to neurology wards

2015· dissertation· en· W7006161737 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHealth careUnavailabilityHospital bedAcute careTask (project management)Matching (statistics)Service (business)Healthcare deliveryPatient safety
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The healthcare sector has received constant appeals from different stakeholders over the past decades to increase operational efficiency and enhance quality of care for patients. Hospital managers and health authorities confront serious challenges in identifying areas for improvement and designing plans to boost healthcare delivery processes, all while maintaining the operational costs aligned with their planned budget. The difficulty of this task is amplified by budget cuts and insufficient resources in the healthcare system. Operations Research models can be used to assist healthcare managers in making informed and evidence-based decisions. This thesis aims at developing patient admission and bed allocation policies in acute care wards, where acquiring extra resources is extremely expensive for hospitals and a delay in treatment is highly undesirable from a patient health perspective. The problem of patient admission and inpatient bed allocation in acute care wards recognizing multiple patient types with different medical characteristics is considered in this thesis. Recent studies have shown that in the event of an acute episode patients are more effectively treated in specialized inpatient settings. The benefits of such specialized care, however, might be offset by long wait times at the emergency department due to bed unavailability in the ward. This research is inspired by the managerial challenges at the neurology ward of the Montreal Neurological Hospital, where the optimal care pathway for patients with neurological diseases is particularly time-sensitive. Failure in matching the hospital's service capacity and patient demand for certain levels of care can be problematic. Moreover, day-to-day fluctuations in demand affect the efficient utilization of hospital capacity. The key issue for matching the demand and service capacity and improving the performance of the hospital is intelligently designed capacity-related policies; both at the strategic and tactical levels. At the tactical level, the admission process of patients to a neurology ward is modeled using an average cost dynamic programming framework. By solving the dynamic program model, we are essentially looking for the dynamic admission policy that provides the best care for all patients in light of limited bed availability. In terms of solution methodology, an integrated approach that combines queuing models and approximate dynamic programming is presented. Furthermore, the performance of the proposed approach is compared with the performance of other heuristic policies that can be suggested for such types of problems. It is shown that the dynamic admission policy that can adjust allocations of the beds based on the state of the ward performs better compared with other static policies. In particular, the dynamic admission policy reduces the average ED boarding time that patients experience before they are transferred to the ward.At the strategic level, the problem of multi-site resource allocation and system configuration in response to the pending merger of two existing sites, i.e., the stroke wards at Montreal Neurological Hospital and Montreal General Hospital, is studied. Designing an appropriate admission policy for patients at the hospital level along with an optimal bed allocation policy between the two sites are the major concerns of hospital managers in this process. Two possible settings for admission of patients to the hospitals are examined to determine which setting would be preferred in terms of minimizing the patient admission refusal rate. Meanwhile, the multi-site bed allocation problem is formulated so that resources are optimally distributed in accordance with the patient flow at each site. It is found that the decision of system configuration for a multi-hospital network requires careful consideration of patient mix in the arrivals, relative length of stay of patients, and the distribution of patient load between hospitals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0060.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior→French-language works237,207→