MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7006169998

Synthèse des journées d'études internationales des 29 et 30 septembre 2011, COMPTRASEC, Université Montesquieu-Bordeaux IV

2011· other· fr· W7006169998 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOskar-Bordeaux (Universite de Bordeaux) · 2011
Typeother
Languagefr
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPosition (finance)PoliticsContext (archaeology)LegislationEconomic Justice
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les journées d'études prennent place dans le programme de recherche ANR " Approche juridique comparée des risques psychosociaux au travail. Démarche française et systèmes étrangers (Europe du Sud et du Nord, Québec, Japon) " (COMPARISK). La première demi-journée est consacrée à la présentation de la politique des institutions européennes. Les deuxième et troisième demi-journées se sont concentrées sur la réception par les Etats membres du Nord et du Sud de la position et de la politique des Institutions européennes dans le champ de la prévention des risques psychosociaux.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.598
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0060.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.008
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0070.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1910.044

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOskar-Bordeaux (Universite de Bordeaux)French-language works237,207