MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7006252104

Surficial Geology Mapping and Submarine Landslides in the Arctic Ocean

2022· article· en· W7006252104 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBathymetric chartArcticBathymetrySlumpingSubmarine pipelineGeologist
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For much of the 20th century, the thick perennial ice-cover of the central Arctic Ocean has limited access to ocean exploration. The first scientific icebreaker expeditions in the region began in the early 1990’s. Since then, international research efforts have combined for a multi-fold increase in the amount of high-resolution geophysical and geological data in the basin. There is now sufficient subbottom profiler, multibeam bathymetry and seafloor sample data in many areas to map the surficial geology of the seabed. In this talk, we present results of ongoing collaborative mapping efforts based on acoustic facies derived from internationally compiled subbottom profiler data. Mapped acoustic facies reveal the distribution of sedimentary processes that have left their mark on the seafloor in the high Arctic throughout the Quaternary. These include glacially eroded shelves and seafloor highs; deep-sea channel systems; contourite features and widespread submarine landslides. Some of these submarine landslides are prodigious in scale, covering extensive areas and involving thousands of cubic kilometers of material. Detailed mapping of two such large submarine landslides located in the southern Canada Basin of the Arctic Ocean suggest they are late-Holocene aged and derived from the Alaska-Beaufort slope. Slope stability along this part of the margin may be affected by a variety of preconditioning factors, including possible gas hydrate dissociation and fluid flow. Initial triggering of slope failure may be related to seismicity associated with ongoing deformation of the margin, or infrequent seismicity of the MacKenzie Thrust. These results reveal new insights into the sedimentary processes and depositional patterns in the basin. Presenter Bio Kai Boggild is a Physical Scientist with the Geological Survey of Canada (Atlantic) in Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada. His background is in seafloor mapping, submarine geomorphology and interpretation of seismic data. He has participated in research cruises both on the Atlantic margin and in the Arctic, where his research focuses on the near-seabed geology and mass movements involving submarine landslides and turbidity currents. He is fascinated by deep-sea processes and always inspired by the surprising things we find when we map the seafloor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.189

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.148 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester)Same topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207