Tournament Trivia (St. Louis PKD National Convention 2005)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ottawa University, Gangwish Library: The Pi Kappa Delta Collection; This item is a single sheet of plain white copy paper. It contents are typed in standard font and appear to be a Microsoft word document processed and printed from a PC computer source. The sheet is in excellent condition with no signs of paper stress or deterioration. No date is specifically noted on the document or place of origin, however, Since St. Louis is mentioned in the text and an individual named "Gina" is noted for event organization it is almost certain that this item was part of the 2005 PKD National Convention and Tournament held in St. Louis, Missouri. The PKD collection has other items from this event including a special issue of the periodical, THE KEY (The Key March 17-18, 2005), where Gina Jensen is noted as the Tournament Coordinator. The contents are titled "Tournament Trivia" and are a series of statements listed vertically, each separated by an asterisk, of serendipitous interesting facts about the convention. Examples of this information include; over $50,000.00 was spent by members in St. Louis while there, there were 564 rounds of debate those involved speaking for over 346 hours; there were performances from over 370 selections of literature; and 585 deserts were served at the banquet. The document also includes a list of the 28 states with schools that participated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.408 | 0.188 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".