MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7006413539

“The Union Can’t Sit Idly By”: 2013 Union Review

2014· article· en· W7006413539 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUKnowledge (University of Kentucky) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLabor Movements and Unions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkforceRecreationNon unionTrade union
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2013, the United States and Canada both issued reports on unionization rates in their respective countries.In its annual union membership survey, the U.S. Department of Labor (2014) reported that the overall union membership in 2013 remained the same as that of 2012, with 11.3% of the workforce belonging to unions.While the highest occupational group unionization rate was among individuals working in education, training, and library occupations, the 2013 rate of 35.3% for this occupational group reflects a decrease from both the 2012 rate of 39.2% and the 2011 rate of 40.5%.An analysis of longterm unionization trends across Canada also reflected a decrease in unionization rates in the information, culture, and recreation industry, with rates dropping from 27.6% in 1999 to 25% in 2012 (Galarneau & Sohn, 2013).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.507
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUKnowledge (University of Kentucky)Same topicLabor Movements and UnionsFrench-language works237,207