MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7006439525

Turkish Televisual Landscape and Domestic TV Fiction

2001· article· en· W7006439525 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDergiPark (Istanbul University) · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTurkey's Politics and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurkishQuarter (Canadian coin)Television studiesTelevision industryTelevision seriesDiversity (politics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the new multi-channel television environment which stili appears as an unsettled landscape, issues of increasing domestic contents always became a crucial consideration. In Turkey, beginnlng with the first quarter of the 1990's, commercial television has drastically increased the need for television programs like elsewhere in Europe. During the years, what comes out clearly, however, is Turkish television is able to offer a large number of domestic television programs, especially domestic television fiction. Today, in contrast to the case with many European countries, television fiction is overwhelmingly Turkish in Turkey. In fact, foreign penetration had never been a serious threat for the Turkish television market. However, it must be added that a large of domestic programme neither always indicates a diversity of content nor a creative industry. In this context, this paper will summarise the findings of a research that focuses on productive activity and capacity of Turkish broadcasters regarding domestic television fiction. The study also seeks to come to a general understanding of recent developments and new trends in Turkish televisual landscape.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDergiPark (Istanbul University)Same topicTurkey's Politics and SocietyFrench-language works237,207