Trastorno Neurocognitivo Leve en el Climaterio con Evaluación Cognitiva Montreal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Women in the climacteric stage or menopausal transition, frequently report complaint in memory. Emerald Study search relate feminine climacteric syndrome \nin their different steps: premenopause (stage -2 early menopausal transition), perimenopause (stages -1 and +1a late menopausal transition and early postmenopause) and postmenopause (stages +1b, +1 c and +2 early postmenopause with late postmenopause), with a possible mild cognitive impairment, that carry \non suspect of Mild Neurocognitve Disorder (mNCD). The final sample were 100 women with high schooling level between 40 and 60 years old. A nonexperimental, non-probability cross-sectional study was conducted through the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Normative results were obtained in \n43.27% and mNCD in 56.73%, finding difference of significant means at the 0.05 level in the three stages of climacteric, resulting in the highest incidence in \nperimenopause, stage of greatest decrease in estrogen. It is concluded that changes in intellectual function may be associated with hormonal variation. mNCD \ncan be determined early, in search of primary care and start-up of reactivation of intellectual functions
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".