MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7006497910

Variable-speed power switch gate driver for switching loss reduction in automotive inverters

2015· dissertation· en· W7006497910 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsInsulated-gate bipolar transistorGate driverSafe operating areaPulse-width modulationPower semiconductor deviceHarmonicPower (physics)DiodeSwitching timeReduction (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the present time, electrical power conversion is performed more and more widely using fully-controllable semiconductor devices such as IGBTs, MOSFETs, and Silicon-Carbide (SiC) MOSFETs, in conjunction with diodes made of the same materials. DC to AC conversion and vice-versa is required in brushless motor/generator drives powered by DC sources, such as batteries in electric and hybrid electric vehicles.This thesis reviews modern gate drivers and performance testing methods for gate drivers. Based on hardware testing results, it introduces a new method of switching loss reduction for IGBT converters, implemented through a series of innovations on the gate driver operation principle and schematics. The switching loss reduction is achieved by varying the IGBT gate current across different switching transitions, depending on the load current and other factors. In particular, it has been shown that increasing the gate current (and switching transition speed) near load current zero-crossings results in more complete utilization density of the IGBT safe operating area, allowing a tradeoff to reduce switching losses, and to increase converter efficiency. The proposed method leaves motor harmonic losses completely unchanged and does not modify the pulse width modulation scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.171
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207