Viene como huésped a sus propios dominios : la llegada a Ítaca como metáfora de la encarnación
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumen: Los cantos XIII a XXIV de la Odisea narran cómo, después de 20 años de ausencia, el rey de Ítaca se hace presente en su reino. Fiel a su metis, su inteligencia multiforme, Odiseo recurre al disfraz de mendigo (en realidad a la transformación obrada por la diosa de la sabiduría) y pide ser hospedado por los suyos en su propia casa. Esta estrategia, tan opuesta a la de Agamenón, se revelará muy eficaz para entrar en contacto con los que habitan su casa, conocer su corazón y ejecutar su venganza. Este trabajo se propone explorar las correspondencias y divergencias de este texto con la teología bíblica de la encarnación. En Jesús de Nazaret se hace presente el Señor del universo y de la historia, largamente esperado. Pero en este Mesías, en este Cristo, este ungido, Dios se presenta, muy significativamente, también de modo velado, “en disfraz” y, según un plan diseñado por su sabiduría, pide ser hospedado en sus propios dominios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".