Un processus de patrimonialisation vivant et populaire en milieu québécois : la fraise de l’île d’Orléans (1900 à aujourd’hui)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
S’inscrivant dans l’histoire culturelle de l’alimentation, l’objet de ce mémoire est de montrer en quoi la fraise de l'île d'Orléans – incubateur réel et symbolique favorisant le développement de l'agriculture et des traditions culinaires – s'ancre dans un processus de patrimonialisation basé sur des mesures de valorisation économiques, sociales et symboliques depuis le début du XXe siècle. Nous proposons donc d’analyser les différentes formes de patrimonialisation à l’œuvre dans ce cas, soit le réinvestissement du passé, la transmission, l’ancrage dans un territoire précis, mais surtout, les stratégies de valorisation déployées par de nombreux acteurs. Comment s’est opérée l’association du lieu au produit, puis du produit à l’identité culinaire québécoise? Ces interrogations, nous proposons de les analyser en levant le voile sur les constructions patrimoniales alimentaires en milieu québécois.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".