MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7006734782

The Well-being of Older Immigrants and Refugees in Canada: Examining the Role of Entry Characteristics on Later-Life Satisfaction

2023· dissertation· en· W7006734782 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMigration, Health and Trauma
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmigrationRefugeePopulationFocus groupCountry of originHuman capitalSocial capital
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite the proportionally large older immigrant and refugee population in Canada, relatively few studies focus on the well-being of older immigrants and refugees in Canada. Existing studies often consider immigrants as a single group and this aggregation leads to a weaker ability to detect important differences within this population. Admission classes through which individuals are granted entry to Canada, namely, economic class, family sponsorship, and refugee class may represent a divergence in the trajectories of newcomers with later-life implications for well-being. This thesis aimed to understand how entry characteristics are associated with the later-life satisfaction of older immigrants and refugees in Canada. A thesis with three studies included a scoping review which identified the role of admission classes on the health of immigrants and refugees, a second study which compared later-life satisfaction between Canadian-born older adults and older immigrants and refugees by admission class, and a third study which examined whether human capital characteristics at arrival were associated with the later-life satisfaction of older immigrants and refugees in Canada. Data from individuals over 55 from the Canadian Community Health Survey (2009-2014) was linked to official landing records within the Longitudinal Immigration Database. Ordinary least squared regression models examined the association between entry characteristics on later-life satisfaction, adjusting for covariates and residency time in Canada. The review confirmed that certain classes of immigrants have worse health outcomes, particularly refugees, family class and dependent applicants. The review also confirmed that there are no existing studies on the well-being of older immigrants in Canada by admission class. The second study found that after accounting for a range of correlates, economic class principal applicants and refugees had significantly lower later-life satisfaction than Canadian-born older adults. The negative association with life satisfaction among economic class principal applicants persisted after accounting for residency time in Canada. The third study found that having no official language proficiency at arrival was significantly associated with lower later-life satisfaction. These findings shed light on important heterogeneity that exists within immigrants and help identify vulnerable immigrants and refugees in Canada at risk of lower later-life satisfaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.217

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0060.011
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)→Same topicMigration, Health and Trauma→French-language works237,207→