Violence interpersonnelle en milieu de travail : une analyse du phénomène en milieu correctionnel québécois Interpersonal violence in the workplace: An analysis of the phenomenon in Quebec’s correctional environment Violencia interpersonal en el medio de trabajo : un análisis del fenómeno en el medio correccional de Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article présente des résultats de recherche issus d’une vaste étude auprès des agents de la paix en services correctionnels québécois (ASC). Le principal objectif poursuivi par ce volet qualitatif d’enquête était de comprendre, via des entrevues individuelles et de groupe, les raisons d’un taux particulièrement élevé de violence interpersonnelle entre les membres d’une même organisation de travail. L’analyse des entrevues a permis de conclure qu’une part importante de la compréhension du phénomène de la violence interpersonnelle entre ASC repose sur le recours par ceux-ci à des stratégies défensives développées en réaction aux sources de souffrance auxquelles ils sont exposés, dont, essentiellement : (1) un travail qui combine une double vocation et qui s’accompagne de sentiments de peur et de frustration, (2) des rapports sociaux marqués par un climat de méfiance et (3) une identité fragilisée par le manque de reconnaissance. Des pistes de solution ont également été dégagées de l’analyse. This article presents research results obtained during a sizeable study of peace officers in Quebec correctional services (CSO). The main goal of the qualitative part of this study was to understand, through individual and group interviews, the reasons for the particularly high interpersonal violence rate among members in this work organization. An analysis of the interviews revealed that the phenomenon of interpersonal violence among CSOs can be best understood through their use of defensive strategies developed in response to the causes of suffering to which they are exposed, including primarily: (1) work involving a dual function and a sense of fear and frustration, (2) social relationships characterized by mistrust, and (3) an identity weakened by a lack of recognition. Possible solutions also emerged from the analysis. Este artículo presenta los resultados de un vasto estudio sobre los guardias de los servicios correccionales de Québec (GSC). El principal objetivo que persigue la parte cualitativa de la encuesta es comprender, por medio de entrevistas individuales y de grupo, las razones de las tasas particularmente elevadas de violencia interpersonal entre los miembros de la misma organización del trabajo. El análisis de las entrevistas permitió concluir que una parte importante de la comprensión del fenómeno de la violencia interpersonal entre GSC reposa sobre el recurso de estos últimos a adoptar estrategias defensivas desarrolladas en reacción a las fuentes de sufrimiento a las que están expuestos, entre ellas, esencialmente : (1) un trabajo que combina una doble vocación y que se acompaña de sentimientos de miedo y de fustración, (2) relaciones sociales marcadas por un clima de desconfianza y (3) una identidad fragilizada por la falta de reconocimiento. Ciertas pistas de solución emergieron también de la encuesta.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.020 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".