MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7006786515

Visual-lidar Map Alignment for Change Detection in Infrastructure Applications

2023· dissertation· en· W7006786515 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrame (networking)Identification (biology)Work (physics)Field (mathematics)Noise (video)Measure (data warehouse)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current human-based infrastructure inspections face several problems. Firstly, human inspectors face safety risks working in hazardous environments and reaching challenging areas in order to inspect an infrastructure asset fully. Secondly, they are time-consuming and costly, requiring significant resources to perform. Lastly, human inspections are subjective and prone to human error, which causes inconsistent assessments. These challenges limit engineers abilities to make accurate assessments of infrastructure health and can make infrastructure management difficult and costly. \n \nCurrent research in Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) has shown promise when applied to automated infrastructure inspections due to its ability to provide accurate 3D maps of infrastructure assets; allowing objective and efficient inspection of assets using the generated 3D models. For the purpose of inspecting infrastructure assets, repeat visits and monitoring changes to the structure are paramount to determining the health of the asset. When generating a 3D map in GPS denied environments (as is typically the case for many infrastructure assets such as bridges), it is typically with respect to the first sensor measurement, meaning multiple scans of the same area will not be in the same reference frame. Many publicly available SLAM solutions do not provide the ability to automatically align 3D scans of the same area from mapping sessions gathered across time (multi-session mapping). When performing repeat inspections of the same asset, data needs to be merged and integrated seamlessly into a single reference frame for accurate association of regions of interest over time. \n \nThe central contributions of this thesis are: the implementation of a generic map alignment algorithm utilizing both visual and lidar data for enhanced robustness, and the collection of an infrastructure centric dataset for repeat inspections. These contributions greatly enhance the usefulness of existing automated infrastructure inspection pipelines by enabling the tracking of changes in infrastructure assets over time, allowing for accurate estimation of the degradation infrastructure assets. These contributions also have a significant impact on the general field of SLAM, by decoupling map alignment from SLAM, researchers have more freedom to explore new SLAM approaches without the necessitation of using approaches that incorporate multi-session capability. \n \nTo achieve accurate and robust 3D map alignment, this work assumes that an initial trajectory of each scan has been generated by SLAM and that camera and lidar data is available from the scanning session. The map alignment process utilizes techniques from Visual and Lidar relocalization to align maps in a way that is robust to environment change. The map alignment approach was validated on the custom datasets gathered in the Structures Lab at the University of Waterloo and at the Conestogo Bridge in Kitchener, Ontario.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Same topicInfrastructure Maintenance and MonitoringFrench-language works237,207