MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7006818783

On the world crisis, Marx and Keynes: some pertinent comments

2012· article· en· W7006818783 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAmericanae (AECID Library) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicStudent Stress and Coping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapitalist systemMarxist philosophyMercantilismQuarter (Canadian coin)CapitalismEconomic analysisTerm (time)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

At the beginning of the fifth year of an unprecedented capitalist crisis, the tendency toward a new collapse of the financial system is just the tip of the iceberg of a generalized bankruptcy. This, despite a monumental injection of resources, equivalent to a quarter of gross world product, to try to right the faltering ship of the global capitalist market. The “Keynesian” remedy, an expression that has not been precisely defined, has failed. In any case, the attempts to combine Marxist analysis with the formulations of the English economist within a common “heterodox” framework lack any kind of rigour. The discussion of this question is the objective of this article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0070.011
Scholarly communication0.0070.010
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0220.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmericanae (AECID Library)Same topicStudent Stress and CopingFrench-language works237,207