MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7006918271

Waterborne cryptosporidiosis: Adopting a mixed methods approach to inform public health decision-making

2008· dissertation· en· W7006918271 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2008
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicParasitic Infections and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaOntario Veterinary College, University of GuelphCenters for Disease Control and PreventionGovernment of OntarioPublic Health AgencyAustralian GovernmentPublic Health Agency of Canada
KeywordsPublic healthRecreationWaterborne diseasesPsychological interventionRisk assessmentEpidemiologyMultidisciplinary approachRisk perceptionPublic health surveillanceHealth impact assessment
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis is an investigation of the epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis in Waterloo Region, Ontario, Canada. This community is the first sentinel site of Canada's integrated enteric disease surveillance system, C-EnterNet. A modified case-control design was used to determine significant risk factors for cryptosporidiosis among Waterloo Region residents between April 2005 and December 2007. A cross-sectional telephone survey was used to estimate daily water consumption patterns for Waterloo Region residents for subsequent use in quantitative microbial risk assessments. Two quantitative microbial risk assessments were developed to estimate the risk of illness from recreational water contact (in natural and treated water venues) and through treated drinking water. Finally, a qualitative study of current key informant perceptions about the adoption of risk assessment by public health and water treatment practitioners to inform decision-making at the community level was performed. The results of this thesis identify how surveillance data, in conjunction with a mixed-method approach, can be used to develop hypotheses for cryptosporidiosis source attribution, to inform public health interventions at the local level. Although based on data from one community, the findings from this study correspond with those reported in other developed countries, and serve as a model for how other Canadian communities could take advantage of existing surveillance data to inform evidence-based public health decision-making. In addition, the thesis presents a case for addressing the issues of waterborne disease in Canadian communities within an ecosystem health framework, through the development of education and communication initiatives to align public health and water treatment practitioners. Finally, it identifies the usefulness of both traditional and novel epidemiological tools to inform public health decision-making at the community level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.162
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.143
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.162
Threshold uncertainty score0.856

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1620.143
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0070.005
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0110.006
Open science0.0050.007
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)Same topicParasitic Infections and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207