ADAPTAÇÃO TRANSCULTURAL E EVIDÊNCIAS DE VALIDAÇÃO DA PERINATAL GRIEF SCALE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
"Objetivo : realizar a adaptação transcultural e evidências de validação da Perinatal Grief Scale para português do Brasil e francês do Canadá. Método : estudo metodológico, envolvendo aplicação da Perinatal Grief Scale a partir do conjunto de procedimentos de adaptação transcultural. A população foram todas as mulheres que tiveram óbito fetal no ano de 2013 residentes no município de Maringá, Paraná, Brasil e por participantes do Centre d’ Études et de Recherche en Intervention Familiale , Université du Québec en Outaouais , Canadá. Resultados : a escala nas versões português e francês mostrou-se confiável nas duas populações. O coeficiente alfa de Cronbach na escala aplicada no Brasil foi de 0,93 e na aplicada no Canadá foi de 0,94. Apenas na versão português, quatro itens não se correlacionaram com a escala total. Conclusão : a Perinatal Grief Scale pode ser utilizada para identificação do estado de luto em mulheres que tiveram óbito fetal, na respectiva versão de cada país."
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.036 | 0.063 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".