MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7007794038

Alerte enlèvement: le plan « Alerte enlèvement » suisse en comparaison internationale

2013· article· fr· W7007794038 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIRIS · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMilitary, Security, and Education Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Plan (archaeology)Public policyExploratory researchLegislation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La présente recherche décrit, dans un premier temps, le système actuel d'information au public que connaît la Suisse dans le cadre des enlèvements d'enfants, plus couramment appelé plan « Alerte enlèvement ». Ensuite, il s'agira de comparer le dispositif helvétique à celui connu dans différents pays occidentaux, à savoir la France, la Belgique, l'Angleterre, le Canada et les Etats-Unis, précurseurs en la matière. Enfin, nous tenterons de proposer diverses pistes de réflexions dans le but de rendre cet outil de recherche plus performant encore.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.036
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.141

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.036
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0090.010
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0160.012
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIRISSame topicMilitary, Security, and Education StudiesFrench-language works237,207