MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7007803007

AL quick look: Twins rookie homers on first MLB pitch

2015· other· en· W7007803007 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternet Archive (Internet Archive) · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicScientific Research and Philosophical Inquiry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeagueWhite (mutation)BayBall (mathematics)Porch
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Twins beat Oakland A's 13-0 The first ball pitched to a rookie ends up out of the park. Here's a quick look at action from around the American League. You can't have a first at-bat better than Minnesota Twins rookie center fielder Eddie Rosario. On the VERY first pitch of his major league career, he sent the ball soaring 400 feet over the left-field wall as the Twins blew out the Oakland A's 13 to 0. He's the 29th player in major league history to hit a home run on his very first pitch. In the rest of the AL Central, the Chicago White Sox rallied past the Detroit Tigers 7-6 thanks to a 4-run 8th inning. Sox left fielder Melky Cabrera batted in 4 runs. The Cleveland Indians racked up 13 hits in a 10-3 win over the Kansas City Royals. In the AL East, the Toronto Blue Jays beat the New York Yankees 5 to 1. The Tampa Bay Rays topped the Boston Red Sox 5-3. And in the AL West, the Texas Rangers blew out the Houston Astros 11-3. The L-A Angels needed a 9th-inning RBI double from second baseman Johnny jee-uh-vuh-TELL-uh to secure a 4-3 win over the Seattle Mariners.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.411
Threshold uncertainty score0.840

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0090.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4110.148

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternet Archive (Internet Archive)Same topicScientific Research and Philosophical InquiryFrench-language works237,207