MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7007877347

The adaptation of Gothic Revival architecture to Christ Church Cathedral, Newcastle, Australia

2018· dissertation· en· W7007877347 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Architecture and Urbanism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchitectureContext (archaeology)Adaptation (eye)History of architectureArchitectural designState (computer science)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Christ Church Cathedral, Newcastle, is the largest Anglican cathedral in New South Wales, and the third largest in Australia. It is a State heritage-listed building and has national significance. The cathedral is relevant in the history of Newcastle and is an important example of Australia’s architectural and cultural heritage. Canadian born, American-trained architect John Horbury Hunt was the first of eight architects/architectural practices involved in the cathedral’s design over almost 130 years. Despite its significance, the architecture of the cathedral remains under-examined, and Hunt’s designs for it minimally explored. This thesis investigates Hunt’s adaptation of Gothic Revival ecclesiastical architecture to Newcastle cathedral. The research will investigate the current literature and the primary source material available on the cathedral and on Hunt, to identify their present positioning and the gaps in knowledge for both. From these sources, it will explore and evaluate the critical influences on Hunt and the development of his architectural design principles. The validation of these principles will be determined through a critical examination and analysis of Hunt’s two designs for this cathedral. In doing so, this thesis evaluates Hunt’s stylistic progression towards a cathedral design suitable for Australia in the nineteenth century. The research will therefore provide a new and expanded understanding of the cathedral and its primary architect, and reposition both in the context of Australian architectural history.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.147
Threshold uncertainty score0.293

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.015
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicHistorical Architecture and UrbanismFrench-language works237,207