MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7007919666

Antwort als Verantwortung. Zur Dimension des Ethisch-Politischen in\nWaldenfels' Phänomenologie der Responsivität

2011· article· de· W7007919666 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhaidra (Universität Wien) · 2011
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTechnology, Environment, Urban Planning
Canadian institutionsCanadian Philosophical Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDimension (graph theory)Subject (documents)SubjectivityPoliticsConstitution
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates which consequences for the constitution of subjectivity in its ethical-political dimension can be drawn from Waldenfels' understanding of responsive phenomenology.The deferment Waldenfels' thinking of responsivity suggests focuses on a precarious conception of the self as it is regarded as radically undisclosed in respect to the Other.Responding to the Other the self is at the time responsible for the Other.Consequently, the dimension of the ethical and the political is not to be taken as an additional aspect of subjectivity.In responding to the demands of the Other and the third party (le tiers) the responsive subject has always already been exposed to ethical and political imperatives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.726
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.044
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.133 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it