Asociatividad de los productores de textiles artesanales de la provincia de San Miguel Cajamarca para promover su exportación al mercado Canadiense, 2020.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT \nThe purpose of this thesis was to seek the associativity of artisan textile producers in the \nprovince of San Miguel in the city of Cajamarca to promote its export to the Canadian market, \nidentifying the most attractive markets and the most suitable for the export of these products, \nknowing its offer and current demand and thus expose the proposals for improvement to generate \nthe associativity \nA non-experimental and descriptive research was carried out; using data collection techniques \nsuch as interviews which were applied to the presidents of the associations and to each one of its \nmembers, to know the process of elaboration of their products and to identify if they have an \nexportable offer. A documentary review was also carried out to generate the study of the Canadian \nmarket, which allowed to determine and analyze the demand of textile products in this country. \nAs a result of the study carried out, it was determined that through associativity a greater \nexportable supply can be generated, as well as searching for more destination markets to \ninternationalize the product. On the other hand, a series of recommendations were proposed, which \nare aimed at encouraging the growth of this sector not only in the province of San Miguel but also \nin the other provinces of the Department of Cajamarca.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".