Autoconcepto y asertividad sexual en estudiantes del primer al quinto ciclo de una universidad privada de Lima Sur
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La investigación tuvo como propósito determinar la relación entre el autoconcepto y la asertividad sexual en estudiantes de una universidad privada de Lima Sur. El tipo y diseño de investigación empleado fueron correlacional - no experimental y transversal; así mismo, la muestra estuvo constituida por 299 estudiantes de dos carreras (Psicología y Derecho), los cuales se encontraban estudiando desde el primer al quinto ciclo, con edades entre 18 a 43 años. Se emplearon la Escala de Autoconcepto de Campbell y la Escala de Asertividad Sexual de Morokoff. Mediante el análisis estadístico no se encontró correlación en las variables mencionadas. En cuanto a las comparaciones de las variables se encontraron diferencias según la carrera y ciclo de estudios. Finalmente, se encontró que el nivel moderado de autoconcepto es el que predomina con un 57.9% y para asertividad sexual un 46.5% con nivel alto.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".