MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7008008388

Ånden, mellem fjelde, is og sne

2024· article· da· W7008008388 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageda
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicKantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHegelianismOrder (exchange)Element (criminal law)Feminism
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Teksten her tager udgangspunkt i G.W.F. Hegels (1770-1831) Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Religion. Jeg vil særligt interessere mig for kapitlet Die Zauberei. Her benytter Hegel sig af to kilder til at beskrive Inuit-folkenes forhold til deres verden. Disse kilder er de to kaptajner John Ross og William Parry, som begge var omdiskuterede personligheder i deres samtid. Hegel bruger disse kilder forholdsvist ukritisk til at kunne opbygge et empirisk korpus til sin teori. Ud fra det vil teksten have 3 ærinde: 1. At spørge, hvad empiriens rolle for Hegels tænkning er? 2. Hvad gør det ved teorien, når kilderne er mangelfulde? Og til sidst 3. indirekte vise forskelle mellem filosofiske og idéhistoriske spørgemåder.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.668
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1090.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicKantian Philosophy and Modern InterpretationsFrench-language works237,207