Airfield Manual: Field Guide to the Transformation of Abandoned Airports
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The book is a companion volume as a field guide to the transformation of abandoned, decommissioned, and deactivated airports. The Harvard GSD Airfield Manual documents case study strategies and best practices for the conversion of decommissioned airports for a variety of new uses from public parks to ecological corridors, from energy farms to new urban districts. Airfield Manual is written for civic, business, and political leaders as well as for directors of aviation, engineers, and managers. Part I of the Manual offers an executive summary of issues and options attendant to the ownership, management, deactivation, and decommissioning of the airport site. This first half of the Manual describes five discrete strategies for the responsible transformation of the airport site through adaptation, conservation, conversion, redevelopment, and regrowth. Part II of the Manual describes in greater technical and operational detail the tools and techniques available for the transformation of the airport site for a variety of ends. These sections of the Manual describe techniques for the transformation of airport hydrology and ecology, infrastructure and engineering. Airfield Manual offers a practical guide to successful strategies, compelling cases, and potent practices assembled from the transformation of airport sites around the world over the past quarter century.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".