Article: Narrowing the Gaps? Gender, Employment and Incomes on the Bonavista\n Peninsula, Newfoundland, 1951-1996
Bibliographic record
Abstract
From a local economy based on an inshore fishery, the Bonavista Peninsula in the Canadian province of Newfoundland has been transformed by the emergence of an industrial capitalist fishery.This area provides an excellent case study of women's experience in a process of development on the periphery of core capitalist societies.In the early period, few women were formally employed.Based on survey and qualitative data sources, this paper documents changes in the relative position of women with respect to employment and incomes.Although by 1996 women remained in a disadvantaged position in most respects, growing labour force participation meant that women's patterns were increasingly similar to men's.This increased participation was not marked by an equivalent closing of the gap in incomes, except among the young.RESUME A partir d'une economie locale basee sur la peche cotiere, la peninsule Bonavista a ete transformee par 1'emergence d'une peche capitaliste industrielle.Ce secteur represente un excellent cas pour l'etude de l'experience des femmes dans le processus de developpement dans la peripheric de base des societes capitalistes.Au debut, peu de femmes etaient employees officiellement.En se basant sur un sondage, et des sources de donnees qualitatives, cet articles documente les changements dans la position relative des femmes en ce qui a rappot a l'emploi et les revenus.Quoiqu'en 1996 les femmes demeuraient dans une position de desavantage dans la plupart des cas, une participation croissante dans le marche du travail signifiait que le situation des femmes devenait de plus en plus semblable a celle des hommes.Cette croissance de la participation des femmes n'etait pas marquee par un retrecissement de l'ecart des revenus excepte parmi les jeunes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".