MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7008144400

Bayesian approaches to trajectory estimation in maritime surveillance

2010· dissertation· en· W7008144400 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2010
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGaussian processTrajectoryBayesian probabilityKalman filterKrigingCovarianceSpline (mechanical)Bayesian inferenceStochastic process
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In maritime surveillance, multi-sensor data differ to a great extent in their temporal resolution. Additionally, due to multi-level security and information management processing, many contact reports arrive hours after observations. This makes the contact report data usually available for batch processing. The dissimilar multi-source information environment results in contact reports with heteroscedastic and correlated errors (i.e. measurement errors characterized by normal probability distributions with non-constant and non-diagonal covariance matrices), while the obtained measurement errors may be relatively large. Hence, the appropriate choice of a trajectory estimation algorithm, which addresses the aforementioned issues of the surveillance data, will significantly contribute to increased awareness in the maritime domain. This thesis presents two novel batch single ship trajectory estimation algorithms employing Bayesian approaches to estimation: (1) a stochastic linear filtering algorithm and (2) a curve fitting algorithm which employs Bayesian statistical inference for nonparametric regression. The stochastic linear filtering algorithm employs a combination of two stochastic processes, namely the Integrated Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process (IOU) and the random walk (RW), process to describe the ship's motion. The assumptions on linear modeling and bivariate Gaussian distribution of measurement errors allow for the use of Kalman filtering and Rauch-Tung-Striebel optimal smoothing. In the curve fitting algorithm, the trajectory is considered to be in the form of a cubic spline with an unknown number of knots in two-dimensional Euclidean plane of longitude and latitude. The function estimate is determined from the data which are assumed Gaussian distributed. A fully Bayesian approach is adopted by defining the prior distributions on all unknown parameters: the spline coefficients, the number and the locations of knots. The calculation of the p

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207