MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7008152620

Boletín 50. La productividad laboral sube o baja según el cristal con el que se la mire

2013· report· es· W7008152620 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRepositorio Institucional UCES (Texas A&M University Libraries) · 2013
Typereport
Languagees
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMireWork (physics)Quarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Una primera lectura de las cuentas nacionales del 2012, sus relaciones y comparaciones con el año anterior, indica que pese a disminuir sensiblemente el ritmo de crecimiento de la economía se mantuvo elevado el rendimiento del factor trabajo y eso impulsó la tasa relativa de creación de empleos. Otra, más ajustada a la percepción de los centros académicos y consultoras privadas, revela el fenómeno inverso. La caída de la inversión bruta interna avala esta visión alternativa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.629
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.012
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRepositorio Institucional UCES (Texas A&M University Libraries)French-language works237,207