MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7008167599

An Arm of the Carceral State: Mental Health Social Worker Complicity in Police Violence

2023· other· en· W7008167599 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueYork University Digital Library (York University) · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthSocial workComplicityCriminal justiceScrutinyMental distressPoison controlPower (physics)Social control
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mass protests against racist police violence in the past decades have led to growing calls for anti-carceral alternatives, including replacing police officers with social workers for mental health crises. But this proposal deserves closer scrutiny considering how mental health social workers have long collaborated with the police. I explore the specificities of these collaborations, along with the discursive underpinnings. These practices are situated in their institutional contexts and the broader intermeshing contexts of racism, settler-colonialism, and disablism. \n\nMental health social workers-initiated police intervention is an integral part of daily social work practice. Institutional ethnographic interviews with mental health social workers and an examination of social work texts reveal three major elements informing mental health social worker-initiated police intervention. First, interviewees consistently cited fear of professional disciplinary measures and other professional obligations as fueling calls for police intervention as a standard response to certain scenarios. The professional ethos of social work, born out of efforts to achieve greater legitimacy and remunerations, and in particular the subjectification of social workers as agents of the carceral state enshrined with the power to intervene upon the lives of oppressed people, also underpins these social work practices. Second, the notion of risk is often brought up as rationale for mental health social worker-initiated police intervention, alluding to mental health social workers serving as specialized forecasters of future harm. This rationalization is tied to the mental health field’s eugenicist origins that conceptualized mad and racialized people as dangerous threats to be contained through repressive measures like forced sterilization, anti-miscegenation, immigration restrictions, and confinement. Finally, mental health social worker-initiated police intervention exists in the context of the settler-colonial capitalist order. The crisis situations described by interviewees as precipitating police intervention are rooted in structural factors, but social workers engage in the task of erasing or obfuscating these underlying processes as a part of their work as disciplinarians. This work illustrates how mental health social workers are a part of the institutional archipelago, the constellation of institutions and practices that operate through carceral logics in the service of maintaining Canadian settler-colonial capitalism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0210.036
Scholarly communication0.0130.006
Open science0.0020.015
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYork University Digital Library (York University)French-language works237,207