MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7008167809

Atypical Relations Between Default, Dorsal Attention, and Frontoparietal Control Networks in Autism Spectrum Disorder

2025· other· en· W7008167809 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueYork University Digital Library (York University) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAutism spectrum disorderDorsumTask-positive networkAutismDefault mode networkNerve netCognitionNeurodevelopmental disorder
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by difficulties in social interaction and communication, and by restricted and repetitive behaviours. We used resting-state functional connectivity fMRI to investigate three intrinsic brain networks which subserve domains of behaviour known to be impacted in ASD; the antagonistic “default” and “dorsal attention” networks – which subserve internally and externally directed cognition, respectively – and the “frontoparietal control” network which flexibly couples with either default or dorsal attention networks in order to dynamically direct the locus of attention. Using a novel method to compare the hierarchical organization of networks between groups, we found atypical organization of the three networks in ASD, including a fractionation of the frontoparietal control network and attenuation of the anticorrelation between default and dorsal attention networks. These results suggest that ASD is associated with atypical hierarchical organization of large-scale intrinsic brain networks, potentially contributing to cognitive and behavioral symptoms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.159
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYork University Digital Library (York University)→French-language works237,207→