Book review: Building Filipino Hawaiʻi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Filipino Community Center (FilCom Center) in Waipahu, Hawai'i is the largest community project brought to fruition by Filipinos in the United States.It is surprising that a community center of this size was constructed in Hawai'i, a society with a long history and background of plantation labor and working-class demographics.The largest Filipino center in America was constructed in Hawai'i, instead of the "Mainland," where the socio-economic resources of Filipinos in the San Francisco Bay area, Los Angeles-Long Beach metropolitan area, San Diego area, Seattle and King County, Chicago, and New York/New Jersey area are at a much higher income level.At first glance, Labrador's Building Filipino Hawai'i is about the FilCom Center and its central role as an "overlapping architecture" in the redefining of the identity of the Filipinos in Hawai'i.The Center symbolizes the transition of Filipinos from being immigrant sakadas (plantation workers) to legitimized and insider "Locals" in Hawai'i.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".