Awareness-Raising Tools Regarding Violence Against Students in Schools: A Literature Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette recension des écrits identifie les caractéristiques communes des outils de sensibilisation existants en lien avec la violence envers les élèves en milieu scolaire, et plus spécifiquement concernant la violence éducative ordinaire en milieu scolaire. Quinze documents pertinents ont été analysés. L’analyse indique d’abord une rareté des outils abordant spécifiquement la violence éducative ordinaire. La plupart des outils se concentrent sur des interventions universelles visant des changements culturels ou pour outiller le personnel à reconnaître et à intervenir lorsqu’il est témoin de violence. Malgré des variations dans le contenu et le format, l’efficacité de ces outils est souvent évaluée sans pouvoir distinguer quels éléments y contribuent. Cette étude met en lumière des caractéristiques partagées et propose des pistes précieuses pour le développement d’un outil de sensibilisation visant à prévenir la violence éducative ordinaire à l’école.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.039 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.012 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".